legacy of King Cetshwayo delivered during the Isithangami, Durban
22 January 2007
Master of Ceremonies and Faciltator Mr Nhlanhla Mtaka
Colleagues Professor Jabulani Maphalala and Dr Reggie Khumalo
Members of the Isithangami here present
Ladies and Gentlemen
It is a matter of great inspiration to see the people of KwaZulu Natal, in
the form of Isithangami, come together, not as observers seeking to out compete
one another in an orgy of criticism and denunciation of others, but with the
serious intention to assist in the rebuilding and reshaping of our province and
the continent.
I am certain that many present today are of the view that the future is
Africa. As we launch this King Cetshwayo Commemorative lecture, we should first
agree on one thing, that this great Zulu victory of 1879, popularly known as
Isandhlwana was not an isolated reaction by a blood thirsty people. It was part
of the continental wars of resistance against colonialism and imperialism and
later apartheid.
It must be said that episodes of resistance occurred in almost every African
colony. Some were settled by short, sharp actions while others were longer.
After occupying the Asante capital, Kumasi the British were besieged there for
four months until they sent for reinforcement. Elsewhere in West Africa,
Samoure Toure, founder of the Mandigo Empire, waged an eight-year campaign
against the French. In Rhodesia the Ndebele fought gallantly against white
invaders. In Kenya the Nandi did the same. However some of these resistance
wars were not in favour of Africans. In Namibia, the German invaders murdered
three quarters of the Nama people between 1904 and 1908. In the British Cape
Colony in 1806, Xhosa speaking South Africans recorded a number of deaths in
the genocidal wars of resistance, in 1811-1812, 1834-1835, 1847-1848,
1850-1853.
While I have your ear, let me state what we see as the objective of my
address this evening, by telling you what I am not going to be doing tonight.
Firstly, we are not going to give you a lesson in the history of Zulu Kings or
of kings and kingdoms in general.
Secondly, we are not going to be addressing you on King Cetshwayo, the Zulu
monarch whose influence was limited only to the geographical area north of the
uThukela River, and whose reach was perhaps proscribed by the ethnic group that
he belonged to.
In a way therefore, this leads us directly to the perspectives we are going
to adopt in looking at the legacy of Inkosi uCetshwayo. We are going to talk
about King Cetshwayo variously as leader and defender of the people, Cetshwayo
as international diplomat and statesman, and as peacemaker among others. Woven
into one, these will form the historical tapestry through which I will speak
about one of our greatest kings today.
In short we have taken the liberty to speak of the relevance of Inkosi
uCetshwayo and his inspiration to the African Renaissance.
For a start let me stay with the struggle against colonialism through the
ages. I would argue that the Bhambatha Uprising of 1906 was influenced in no
small measure by the victory at Isandhlwana. I am equally aware that the battle
of the Maji Maji from 1905�1907, waged against German encroachment in East
Africa, was also influenced by this victory. The Algerian War of Independence
(1954�1962) from which Frantz Fanon launched his psychoanalysis of the colonial
mindset and system, also benefited from Isandhlwana.
If the Bhambatha Uprising started the art of guerrilla warfare in Africa,
many subsequent movements on this continent which struggled by force of arms
against racism and colonialism, therefore ultimately owed their conviction to
the bravery displayed by the Zulu warriors in that famous victory. Therefore so
does the Mau-Mau guerrilla warfare in Kenya (1952�1956); the first and second
Chimurenga wars of liberation in Zimbabwe in the 1890s and 1970s and the Soweto
students revolts in 1976 which unleashed thousands into the waiting arms of
Umkhonto we Sizwe in exile.
It is important to speak of the struggle because I believe this is the basis
for our true liberation and our ability as equals to seek an African
Renaissance among the nations of the world.
Writing in The London Independent on 24 November 2006 Ian Herbert had this
to say about Inkosi uCetshwayo and I quote:
"Britain had no reason to cherish the Zulu king Cetshwayo kaMpande in the
early days of 1879. He inflicted on the British Empire the most crushing
military defeat it had known. Only the legendary British fight back at Rorke's
Drift, immortalised in the film Zulu, starring Michael Caine, has preserved the
reputation of those military leaders who decided to take him on in the Zulu
War."
4
Herbert continues: "But Cetshwayo has now been deemed worthy of an
(appropriate) accolade that will hang outside the townhouse in Kensington,
London, where he stayed, only three years after his massacre of the British."
In its publication Sechaba, the then-banned African National Congress (ANC)
said and I quote:
"On January 22 (1979), our movement commemorated the centenary of the battle
of Isandhlwana. Indeed, it was more than just a commemoration, it was a
celebration. On that day Cetshwayo's men outmanoeuvred and wiped out to a man,
an entire column of the British invading force - the most modern and
well-equipped that the world's leading colonial power could put up into the
field. This was one of the most humiliating defeats in the annals of British
military history�."
The Sechaba article continues and I quote:
"The remarkable heroism of our people resisted the robbery, rape and plunder
of our land by invaders. The intruders paid dearly in life and blood. The
indomitable fighting spirit among our people is based on the revolutionary and
military traditions of our people: Griqua, Pedi, Sotho, Shangaan, Tswana,
Xhosa, Zulu and others. The Shakas, Makandas, Sekhukhunis, Moeshoeshoes and
Cetshwayos of today are in Umkhonto we Sizwe."
Describing the terrible cost of victory after the Battle of Isandhlwana, as
the wounded did not make it to the purification ceremonies, King Cetshwayo
said:
"I was King of the Zulus, had my country invaded by the Queen's troops,
tried to defend my country, but was beaten, taken captive and brought down here
(to Cape Town) by the Queen's orders. Here I intend to remain until the Queen
restores me to Zululand."
So here we have established a hero of the liberation movements of the world
and a diplomat. We have above a seeker of peace. We have here a unifier and we
have a combination of traits that are necessary for the New Man, the New Woman
of the African Renaissance and the quest for a new African identity.
It is important that, as we create a new environment for Africa's revival,
we constantly and consciously remove any notion that an African identity is a
racial one. This notion of race has at its heart the unscientific idea that
race is a pure category. It is exactly this that was largely responsible for
the perpetuation of racism and colonialism against those who were perceived to
be of a lesser hue than others.
For this reason, it is important to state that the cost of slavery,
colonialism and racism is not only a cost to Africans and other so-called Third
World communities who were at the receiving end of these systems. The human
cost of slavery is to be debited to the entire human race. This is the same
human race that we know today emanates from one single source, which is Africa
the Cradle of Humankind. The capacity to inflict death and destruction on self
and neighbour tells us of the depths of depravity that human beings are capable
of descending to. Against the atrocities of Rwanda and Burundi, our collective
memories remain perhaps our potent weapon, but it is a true African Renaissance
that will truly ensure that such never happens again.
Painful as it is sometimes is, for Africans to assume their correct position
in the annals of history it is necessary that we look back. It is particularly
necessary in a place such as Africa where to this day, we are still reaping the
whirlwind of our collective follies as the human race, where the legacy of
racial suppression continues to place the African in a position of economic
subservience to the rest of the world. Thus, it will be appropriate that we are
reminded that at one point Africa was also the Cradle of Science, Africa was
once the centre of mathematics, as it has been the centre of philosophical and
other intellectual pursuits. Most of this glorious past belongs to an era long
lost during which there was extended peace and security on the continent, a
condition that is necessary for the African Renaissance.
In a tribute to Congo's first President Patrice Lumumba, in the essay
"Lumumba's
Death: Could We Do Otherwise," published in his book Toward the African
Revolution (1964), Frantz Fanon makes these observations:
"Africa must understand that it is no longer possible to advance by regions,
that, like a great body that refuses any mutilation, she must advance in
totality, that there will not be one Africa that fights against colonialism and
another that attempts to make arrangements with colonialism. Africa, that is to
say the Africans, must understand that there is never any greatness in
procrastination and that there is never any dishonour in saying what one wants
and that in reality the cleverness of the colonised can in the last analysis
only be his courage, the lucid consciousness of his objectives and of his
alliances, the tenacity that he brings to his liberation."
Thus defined, the African renaissance is an opportunity for Africans to set
the agenda according to their own realities and to take account of the reality
and the world around them. It is about Africans being the agents of their own
history and masters of their own destiny. A question may be asked as to why the
renaissance of the continent is so important to South Africa.
Indeed as pointed out by Andrew F Cooper, "because of its unique position
and experience with transformation, the expectation on South Africa as a
catalyst for an African Renaissance, remains exceptionally high."
Advancing the African Renaissance cause to the international audience in
1999, President Thabo Mbeki spoke of "the inspiring perspective of African
unity and solidarity and the renewal of our continent as the cornerstone for
the role of Africa" in the world. President Mbeki said it was critically
important to develop "Pan African solidarity into a popular movement for an
African Renaissance and that accordingly�political organisations and
governments in all African countries should be mobilised to act in furtherance
of the objectives of the African Renaissance. Equally, the masses and their
organisations in all African countries should similarly be mobilised. We must
pay attention to the intelligentsia, professionals, traditional leaders,
cultural workers, the media, and bring them into the popular struggle."
President Mbeki further argued that the conditions existed for the African
Renaissance to become a practical programme of action to enable:
* the completion of the continental process of the liquidation of the
colonial system in Africa
* the recognition of the bankruptcy of colonialism and neo-colonialism by the
masses of the people throughout the continent, including by the middle
strata
* the weakening of the struggle among major powers for spheres of influence on
our continent at the end of the Cold War.
It was thus in the interest of all Africans to encourage the realisation of
these goals throughout the continent, at the same time as they are pursued in
each individual country. This would make participation in world politics by
Africans more meaningful. Indeed, the participation of provinces in their
self-defined roles in South Africa's own renaissance will make the country's
participation in the African Renaissance more meaningful.
In essence this would ensure that when we say the people shall govern we
mean that among others democratic institutions have been established, but we
also mean that there are structures and sufficient efforts towards the economic
development of the continent.
This means:
* establishing the institutions and procedures that would enable the African
continent collectively to deal with questions of democracy, peace and
stability
* achieving sustainable economic development that results in the continuous
improvement of standards of living and quality of life of the masses of
people
* qualitatively changing Africa's place in the world economy so that it would
be free of the yoke of international debt burden and no longer a supplier of
raw materials and an importer of manufactured goods
* ensuring the emancipation of women of Africa
* recovery of Africa's creative past to recapture the people's cultures,
encourage advancement of science and technology
* strengthening the genius independence of African countries and continent in
their relations with the major powers and enhancing their role in the
determination of the global system of governance in all fields; including
politics, the economy, security, information and intellectual property, the
environment, and science and technology
* using African culture and language to redefine Africa's identity relative to
the rest of the world.
To return to the beginning, I would argue that King Cetshwayo had a lasting
influence on the liberation struggle against colonialism and apartheid. I have
also argued that the current trajectory of the African Renaissance, which is
part of the continued liberation of Africa, is a continuation of the victory at
Isandhlwana. I would also argue that between these strands there is no doubt
that King Cetshwayo, in the way he carried himself while in London and in
dealings with white people, was also a diplomat. He was able to keep a cool
head in the face of adversity.
It is also clear that when unity was needed, King Cetshwayo was able to
argue for the setting aside of personal differences with his brothers, in order
that they could face a common enemy that wanted to annihilate the Zulu nation.
These I would argue are some of the key tenets that are necessary for Africa to
take its place in the community of nations.
It is clear that the personal character of the political King Cetshwayo is
complex and varied. It is easy to conclude however that with further study and
research, King Cetshwayo will begin to occupy his rightful place in the history
of Africa and humanity as a whole.
This will not happen automatically. History is what is recorded. Put
differently, what is not recorded is not history, no matter how heroic an
achievement it is. This is the challenge posed by the African Renaissance to
intellectuals and the Wise among our people in KwaZulu Natal to document events
of the past and present, so we create our own history and histography.
I thank you.
Issued by: KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Government
22 January 2007
Source: KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Government (http://www.kwazulunatal.gov.za/)