D Hanekom: TT100 Gala Dinner

28 September 2006

Honoured guests
Ladies and gentlemen

The world of biotechnology is perhaps one of our most powerful weapons in
the fight against HIV and AIDS, tuberculosis (TB), malaria and other diseases
that wreak havoc in our country and indeed the continent of Africa. It is the
biotechnology cluster that will help us win not only the fight, but the whole
battle.

It is the untiring work of many of the folk gathered here tonight. You are
unanimous in your vision of creating solutions to combat the health problems
facing this country. Your work and the investment of the venture capitalist
community to transform your efforts into true workable solutions cannot be
underestimated. It has the backing of the government and the private sector and
if we all work together, our efforts will be richly rewarded. What better
reward is there than to see our fellow citizens devoid of the dreadful diseases
I mentioned earlier?

We should not deceive ourselves and the public by pretending that there are
simple solutions. There is no such thing. What is clearly needed is a set of
measures that are developmental in their nature, that address real and
immediate needs and that are complimentary and sustainable in their
conceptualisation and in practice. Our goals are about creating a better life
for all our people and in particular for the poor and we need to follow
frameworks that can help us achieve our aims of pushing back the frontiers of
poverty.

In an intensely competitive global environment, our country's future
international competitiveness is determined increasingly by our ability to find
better and smarter ways of doing things. And our ability to innovate will be
the outcome of the quality and depth of our human and knowledge resources. The
following excerpt was taken from the Deputy Minister's speech National Advisory
Council on Innovation (NACI) workshop on "Measuring Systems Of Innovation" in
April 2006 I believe it is highly pertinent here John van der Meer.

A number of short to medium term challenges to the attainment of our growth
targets are set out in the recently released Accelerated and Shared Growth
Initiative for South Africa (AsgiSA). This initiative consists of a set of
cross-sectoral interventions that will result in faster growth, while at the
same time tackling the challenges of poverty, unemployment and inequality. The
targets that have been set include: The reduction of poverty and unemployment
by 50 percent by the year 2014; and the achievement of average economic growth
rates of 4,5% between now and 2009 and 6% between 2010 and 2014.

A number of sectors that are seen to be competitive with growth potential
have been identified. Among the priority sectors currently under consideration
are: bio-fuels; chemicals; metals and metallurgy; agriculture and
agro-processing; creative industries; wood pulp and paper; as well as,
clothing, textiles and durable consumer goods.

For South Africa to achieve and maintain higher levels of economic growth
and job creation, we must become more proactive in the development and
commercialisation of innovative technologies. Incremental improvements,
imitation and adaptation, on their own, will not be a sufficient foundation for
long-term competitive advantage and economic growth.

The 1996 White Paper on Science and Technology introduced the National
System of Innovation as the basis of our science and technology interventions
in the South African economy. Aligned with our national developmental
priorities and programmes, such as the AsgiSA and the National Spatial
Development Programme (NSDP), amongst others, substantial progress has already
been made in this regard.

This is reflected in the establishment of the Department of Science and
Technology (DST) as a stand-alone Ministry in 2004. The department has the
distinct mandate for governance of the cross cutting aspects of science and
technology in the National System of Innovation. We have set ourselves the
target of spending a minimum of 1% of Gross Domestic Products (GDP) of public
and private expenditure on research and development by 2008.

The department's ongoing efforts towards achieving further economic growth
by stimulating research and development in the private sector have been given
added impetus with the Minister of Finance's February 2006 announcement of the
150% tax credit for Research and Development (R&D). This new tax incentive
means that, with a corporate tax rate of 36%, Government will forego 18 cents
of tax revenue for each rand spent on R&D. What this effectively means is
that the private sector has real incentives to spend more on research in
support of their own business objectives. Given that the private sector
expenditure on R&D currently amounts to about 0,45% of GDP, this tax credit
could translate to a further R1 billion allocated to R&D.

Tax credits for private sector R&D investment has been tried and tested
in a number of countries, including Singapore, Canada and Australia. In sectors
such as biotech and agro processing, the estimated annual rate of return on
R&D is over 40%. As part of its co-ordinating role in the National System
of Innovation, the Department of Science and Technology is responsible for
compliance by publicly funded institutions with good corporate governance
practices and alignment with the strategic focus of the NSI. In line with this,
the DST is responsible for the monitoring and performance of science councils
and has successfully introduced and implemented a key performance indicator
reporting programme.

Among the key development and growth constraints identified in AsgiSA is the
shortage of suitably skilled human resources. These are particularly felt in
science and technology based jobs. The development approach of the Department
of Science and Technology is underpinned by efforts to realise the full
potential of science and technology through the development of human resources.
In particular, these efforts are aimed at increasing the number of young people
that enter and remain in science related studies and careers. Centres of
excellence and the renewal of academic research and innovation require a
generation of young South Africans that are committed to the task of research
and innovation based on knowledge advantages that we secure for ourselves.

Related to this, the Research Chairs Programme, which aims at producing 210
Research Chairs by the year 2010, has the potential to reverse the systemic
decline in research outputs, focus and capacity at publicly funded higher
education and research institutions as well as at science councils throughout
the country.

In line with South Africa's spatial development priorities, which are aimed
at ensuring an equitable development spread among the country's nine provinces,
the DST is working co-operatively with specific provinces in order to harness
and enhance a range of world-class R&D capacities and positions of relative
advantage.

The development of astronomy as a geographical advantage is a case in point.
South Africa's bid for the largest radio-telescope in the world (the Square
Kilometre Array) a $1,5 billion project has been prepared with the full
co-operation of the Northern Cape Government. This is just one example of
exciting growth in our investment in science infrastructure. DST has secured
new and additional resources to the level of R1,2 billion over the next three
years to develop and renew science and technology infrastructure.

Cumulatively, these interventions and achievements are indicative of the
growing robustness of South Africa's National System of Innovation. Ongoing,
co-ordinated and effective measurement of progress is critical to the
Department of Science and Technology's policies and the confidence the public
has in our investments.
However, measuring our progress cannot be simply anecdotal. Reporting our
achievements and identifying constraints needs a focus on outputs and impact
not presently easily available.

We are confident that our understanding and measurement of the country's
R&D activity has significantly improved. This is to a large part
attributable to the regular National Research and Experimental Development
Survey undertaken by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). The 2003/04
Survey revealed that our national R&D expenditure of R10,1 billion amounts
to 0,81% of GDP, which puts us firmly on track towards the envisaged 1% of GDP
in 2008.

The National Advisory Council on Innovation (NACI) has now commissioned a
project to supplement the R&D survey's input measures with output measures.
This follows a Cabinet request that output measures be provided which
complement the R&D survey in order to improve understanding of the
effectiveness of the national system of innovation. The Tracking Public R&D
Expenditure project will yield further empirical evidence of the contribution
that R&D makes in addressing the national imperatives of the country.

NACI has convened this workshop in the recognition that the discussions over
the next two days can further guide the development of metrics for our national
system of innovation with the aim of reinforcing the foundation for competitive
advantage and growth as set out in AsgiSA.

Such metrics should recognise the importance of:
* both technology push and demand pull as factors influencing the rate of
innovation;
* attributes of the public policy environment and linkages to the innovation
infrastructure as important determinants of national innovation potential
changes in innovation management practices, types of innovation, innovation in
the service sector and customer value
* national outcomes such as employment, economic growth, competitiveness and
trade balance.

Werner Von Braun (who was literally a rocket scientist) once said "Research
is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing." The question is: how does
one measure or indeed value such an apparently purposeless activity?

During the last four decades OECD governments have used analytic tools to
measure the input of resources to national R&D programmes in the firm
belief that R&D has a positive effect on economic growth, even though this
relationship was not precisely described. The first approach to measuring the
benefits of S&T knowledge focused on the "linear" model of innovation where
an investment in R&D would eventually lead to wealth creation or a social
benefit. Current models take a much wider view of the innovative process and
recognise that R&D is only one of several inputs to wealth generation and
social progress within a complex socio-economic system

Your work here today and tomorrow is of critical importance in shedding
light on the current state of knowledge in respect of the measurement of
R&D and innovation and their relationship to other economic variables. Your
discussions will hopefully also provide answers to a variety of questions
relating to: How R&D can further contribute to economic growth and reduce
poverty? How Science and Technology spending produces high-level skills? How
will public expenditure, as well as public and private knowledge development
and application achieve sustainable development?

Developing robust metrics that clearly describe the dynamics of innovation
is much needed in South Africa and indeed in other parts of the developing
world. Having said that, I recognise that the work of improving such
measurements is very much work in progress at this stage.

Innovation is inherently dynamic and constantly evolving. As such, no set of
measurements can be complete, definitive and immutable. In keeping with this
message, remember the KISS principle: Keep Innovation Systems Simple! That is -
simple enough to describe them adequately, but not in a trivial way. Enrico
Fermi, talking of experimental science, said: "There are two possible outcomes:
If the result confirms the hypothesis, then you've made a measurement. If the
result is contrary to the hypothesis, then you've made a discovery." I hope you
have a bit of both in the next two days.

Thank you.

Issued by: Department of Science and Technology
28 September 2006
Source: Department of Science and Technology (http://www.dst.gov.za)