MEC for Finance Mr. Rob Tooley during the occasion of the tabling of the provincial budget for 2017/18
Madam Speaker
Honourable Premier
Colleagues in the executive
Honourable members of this the 5th legislature executive mayors and mayors
Speakers and whips of councils our magoshi
Distinguished guests, fellow citizens of Limpopo greetings to you all
A hundred years ago in a village in Bizana, a child was born, who would grow up to be a ‘colossus that strode the world’ to quote President Mandela.
President Tambo if he was still alive would be a hundred years old this year in October. He is the leader whose name as you correctly said honourable Premier, is synonymous with unity. He led our people and our movement during the most trying period of our history, and was able to forge a united organisation and people. We are a testimony to his efforts as a new country and nation in the making.
Madam Speaker and honourable members, the 2017 budget statement is inspired by the vision of our country that President Tambo articulated when addressing the fourth congress of FRELIMO in 1983 in Maputo were he said and I quote “we in the ANC and the revolutionary alliance which we head, have never considered freedom to be the substitution of black for white faces in the corridors of power, while leaving unchanged the exploitative economic infrastructure from which racism receives its sustenance. We have always understood that the uprooting of the oppressive system must necessarily entail the seizure of the key centres of economic power – as stipulated in our Freedom Charter - and their transference to the common ownership of the people."
We are also guided by the tasks the SONA and SOPA have set for us as implementers of the mandate of our people.
But we are doing all these when Global economic growth in 2016 has been lacklustre, though the world economic activity is projected to pick up pace in 2017 and 2018, especially in emerging market and developing economies, there is a wide dispersion of possible outcomes around the projections, given uncertainty surrounding the policy stance of the new United States (U.S.) administration and its global ramifications as well as June 2016, when the United Kingdom (U.K.) voted in favour of leaving the European Union (Brexit).
Global growth is projected to recover to 3.4 percent in 2017, then up to 3.6 percent in 2018. The Advanced Economies are projected to grow at 1.9 percent in 2017, and then to 2 percent in 2018, while growth in the Emerging Markets and Developing Economies will improve from 4.1 percent to 4 percent in 2018. In Sub-Saharan Africa GDP growth is estimated to show that the economy will rise to 2.8 and 3.7 percent in 2017 and 2018 years respectively.
Our country, honourable members, is a country with an unemployment rate of above 25 percent and is one of the most unequal societies in the world. In recent years the mining industry has been culling jobs as commodity prices have fallen in the international markets, throwing many communities and towns into economic distress. The loss of jobs in mining is felt in other industries as well, hence the general saying in South Africa, that when mining sneezes, the economy catches a cold.
The South African economy only expanded at an annualized 0.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016, compared to vastly improved growth of 3.5 percent in the third quarter of 2016 and it is estimated that the economy will only expand by 0.9 percent in the first quarter of 2017. From the third quarter of 2016 to 2017 the economy showed positive signs of growth and it is mainly supported by mining, general government services and real estate activities. The largest contributor to GDP growth in the third quarter of 2016 was mining and quarrying, which grew at 5.1 percent. This was largely due to increased production in the mining of ‘other’ metal ores, iron ore in particular.
Activities related to the local government elections in August 2016 also contributed positively to economic growth. The payment of additional salaries to thousands of temporary electoral staff, as well as increased spending on goods and services, pushed general government services up by 1.8 percent. Other industries that recorded positive growth were finance (1.2 percent), personal services (0.6 percent), construction (0.3 percent) and transport (0.3 percent)
The economy of Limpopo province has sustained a positive trajectory over the years, only recording negative growth in 2009 largely due to the global financial crisis. The local economy has been on a positive growth path in the past years, recording a 2.0 percent GDP growth rate in 2015 however, honourable members, 2.0 percent GDP growth rate is below the LDP targeted GDP growth of 3 percent which was deemed suitable to stimulate job creation in the province.
In terms of the Districts economic performance, the Districts’ GDP growth rate trends tend to follow a similar pattern with the provincial trend. Waterberg District economy has been performing better than the other Districts and this is mainly attributable to the recent economic activities in the Lephalale area of the District. Generally, the Limpopo Districts economies are on a positive path except for Vhembe and Mopani Districts which recorded negative growth between 2012 and 2014.
Honourable Speaker, we do believe that when it comes to the Vhembe Region, the development of the Makhado Musina Special Economic Zone will have a huge impact on economic growth in this region, the developments thus far are progressing as anticipated and details of this exciting project will be elaborated on by the MEC. In Mopani we see that considering the good rains we have experienced in the region the growth in the agricultural sector will be significant.
In terms of contribution to the provincial GDP growth in 2015, Agriculture has experienced a negative contribution of -0.2 percent; this is evident due to the prolonged severe drought in the province that affected the horticultural crops and animal production. We hope for an improvement in this sector due to the recent rains, which many believe has broken the drought, re a leboga PULA!!!
The Minister of Finance during his speech to the National Assembly last week suggested 9 principles to guide the transformation agenda, and we refer to 5 here, those being:-
The litmus test of our programs must be what they do to create jobs, eliminate poverty and narrow the gap of inequality;
Transformation must result in an economy that belongs to all, black and white, where the legacy of racial domination is no longer visible;
Transformation should build on and strengthen democracy and entrench open and transparent governance;
Transformation must achieve a more balanced structure of ownership and control of our economy;
We must also confront cartels and collusion robustly and provide new opportunities for access to markets.
The five points mentioned above will be something that EXCO may want to consider in detail to ensure that we can consistently measure the transformation in the economy, particularly in the SCM space. We need more people to be economically active and radical transformation is therefore, not an option but a must. To increase our tax base the transformation agenda should be aggressively implemented.
Honourable members, it is by now a settled discourse among policy makers that public procurement can be used as a means to achieve horizontal policy objectives of governments the world over. These include examples like buy–America and preference for small and disadvantaged business in the USA, set-asides for aboriginals in Canada and targeted procurement for indigenous business in Australia.
It is therefore not surprising that South African government has identified public procurement as a lever to promote socio-economic policies and transform this all important sector. Policies play a crucial role but without proper implementation and commitment to implement from all stakeholders, they become a policy failure. The successes of the Preferential Procurement Regulations in 2017 will be dependent on the commitment of all stakeholders to realise the dream of an inclusive economy.
To give impetus to the NDP, the President announced in his State of the Nation Address in 2015 that “government will set-aside 30% of appropriate categories of State procurement for purchasing from SMMEs, Co-operatives as well as Township and Rural Enterprises”.
The Preferential Procurement Regulations 2017 are premised on three inter-related government policy objectives:
Socio-economic transformation;
Promotion of Small Enterprises, Cooperatives, Rural and Township Enterprises; and
Promotion of Local Industrial Development.
The Preferential Procurement Regulations, 2017 provides for an added advantage to designated groups and Small Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) also classified as EMEs and QSEs in the BBBEE Act and the Codes of Good Practice.
Introduction of pre-qualification criteria for procurement on the basis of B-BBEE status level, requires that EMEs or QSEs which are 51% owned by either of the following individuals, partnerships or groups: Blacks; Black Youth; Black Women; Black people with disabilities; Black people living in rural or under-developed areas or townships; cooperatives owned by Black people and Black Military Veterans will qualify to do business with the state.
Therefore the introduction of a pre-qualification criteria will allow the advancement of these selected categories of people by limiting competition, amongst themselves. Well established companies will also be able to compete if they meet further requirements of subcontracting to these designated groups should they (established company) be successful in being awarded state tenders. The revised regulations require organs of state to plan and identify tenders that will be used for empowerment in terms of pre-qualification criteria, compulsory subcontracting, local production and content or general application of the preference point system.
It is here Honourable Speaker and Honourable members that each department’s procurement plan with the necessary timelines will be scrutinised to ensure these opportunities are met. Ensuring that there is fair distribution of subcontracting opportunities amongst designated groups. Ensuring that subcontractors are drawn from the central supplier database to avoid contracts being awarded to bogus and undeserving enterprises. Where it is necessary to negotiate with the preferred suppliers, those negotiations are conducted with fairness and integrity and not to favour or disadvantage any supplier.
The expected outcomes to these changes is that an increased number of designated groups will participate in economic activity of the country especially through public procurement; and there should be an increase in monetary value of tenders awarded to these designated groups.
The Public Procurement Bill aims to, among other things, define and articulate a system of public procurement and supply chain management consistent with the provisions of our Constitution; Allow for the flexible and effective pursuit of policy objectives which should redress the imbalances of the past, while committing to an environmentally sustainable future; and provide for public procurement which is developmental in nature and outlook, aspiring to expand the productive base of the economy, supporting innovation and investment.
The Bill, once enacted, would replace the PPPFA in its entirety and introduce measures that allow for targeted procurement in a more intentional manner. Public Procurement Bill, once passed will consolidate all procurement laws into a single legislation.
Here in our province, honourable members, we have negotiated an instrument with our banker, Standard Bank, as you will recall we announced this facility in last year’s tabling of the budget, however it has taken us a year to develop and agree to the terms of reference and the legal framework with the bank and so now we have a facility with a value equivalent to R300 million over the next three years, which will assist those emerging enterprises mentioned above to offer the state services. This facility is to provide bridging or working capital to these identified suppliers who are awarded tenders yet face challenges in carrying out their projects. We will provide details to this august house once finalised.
In the same breath allow me madam speaker to thank Standard Bank who on behalf of this administration donated ten houses to designated individuals in the Tzaneen and Makhuduthamaga Municipality’s. We will continue to partner with Standard Bank in addressing the various challenges that we are grappling with.
Honourable Premier, indeed as you pointed out during SOPA, audit outcomes of our province continue to improve. Operation Clean Audit as instructed by EXCO is in full swing, the ideal is that we should achieve and sustain clean audits in all provincial departments and municipalities in the short to medium term. The role of oversight bodies like Audit Committees, Internal Audit and SCOPA, MPAC at municipal level, are fundamental to good governance and accountability as has been emphasised on numerous occasions, and it is happening.
Our continued Section 18 intervention in Education is beginning to show some positive results and we are predicting that we can salvage this department out of a disclaimer audit outcome at the end of this financial year. There is still some work to be done and we anticipate to exit from the finance division in Education by the end of July 2017.
We have as the Provincial Treasury agreed with the National Treasury, to focus on the following key issues, those are, to improve accountability, to ensure effective financial management and insure good governance in all departments and public entities.
Honourable Members as you are aware the new Municipal Standard Chart of Accounts (mSCOA) will be implemented form 1 July 2017, and it is envisaged to contribute to greater transparency and consistency in municipal finance. As mentioned to improve audits in this sphere of government, we must appoint appropriately skilled senior management in the administration and we will be discussing the issue of ICT in the municipal sphere, one system for all is our thinking.
While introduction of the Central Supplier Database (CSD) will improve transparency and fairness in the procurement space, we will also monitor and provide support on revenue management, including appropriate tariff setting, regular billing and an effective collection system. Focus on the confirmation of government debts, and payments to Municipalities as an offset from the departmental allocations.
We will also monitor and support asset management to ensure that each Municipality has a credible asset register and that once submitted for audit it is reliable and appropriate. Performing asset work is very tedious and hard work, we need dedicated and committed staff to carry out this responsibility, and this cannot be outsourced.
Through EXCO, we have allocated R50 million to Thabazimbi Municipality, and R20 million will be allocated to Musina Municipality in 2017/18 financial year to cushion financial distress. Provincial Treasury has also seconded an official to Mokgalakwena Municipality as an acting CFO, a financial specialist to Thabazimbi Municipality and an acting Municipal Manager to Vhembe District Municipality, this is done to assist administration whilst the Municipalities are in the process of filling the vacant positions. It is about our intergovernmental relations and our responsibility to assist local governments to manage and ensure there is quality service delivery to the people of the province.
Our budget process, honourable members, is aligned to the National Treasury budget process schedule which is issued every year.
Provincial Treasury plays a crucial role in driving the budget reform process in the province.
During the preparation of budget for the 2017 MTEF it is the responsibility of the Provincial Treasury to ascertain that all departments submit the required budget documents on time and in the correct formats. The Provincial Treasury does this task as part of the Executive Council Budget Committee (EXCOBUDCOM) responsibility, which ensures better alignment of budget allocations to policy priorities within the expenditure control framework.
The provincial government derives funding from Equitable Share, Conditional Grants and Provincial Own Revenue. The Equitable Share budget for 2017/18 financial year is R51.9 billion. This amount is projected to grow to R55.4 billion in 2018/19 and R59.4 billion in 2019/20 financial years respectively. The Conditional Grant allocation is R7.9 billion in 2017/18, R8.4 billion and R8.9 billion for the years 2018/19 and 2019/20 respectively. Provincial Own Revenue estimates increases from the original estimates of R1.0 billion in 2016/17 to R1.1 in 2017/18 financial year. This amount is projected to grow to R1.2 billion in 2018/19 and R1.3 billion in 2019/20 financial year.
Provincial own revenue forms part of the total provincial receipts that is allocated to departments to address provincial spending priorities. The provincial own revenue collection contributes R1.1 billion or only 1.8 percent in 2017/18 financial year.
Of that revenue the bulk of the revenue is generated in the Department of Transport at 43.4 percent mainly on motor vehicle licenses, followed by Provincial Treasury at 16.5 percent from interest earned on positive bank balances.
Department of Health is the third largest revenue contributor at 16.1 percent, here Honorable members we anticipate to improve our revenue collection considering Treasury's additional funding given to Health to ensure there are revenue clerks at all our facilities to improve the collection of patient fees, while Economic Development, Environment and Tourism contributes 13.4 percent primarily from casino and horse racing taxes, and we anticipate that considering the investment made on the improvement of facilities in our game reserves we will realize an increase in the revenue stream. Other Departments contribute 10.6 percent of the total provincial own revenue collection.
A budgeted amount of R61.4 billion is made available for spending by provincial departments for 2017/18 financial year. This amount is projected to grow to R64.3 billion in 2018/19 and R68.1 billion in 2019/20. The allocation represents a positive growth of 7.9 percent in 2017/18 and 6.1 percent over the MTEF. The growth rate increase of 7.9 percent in 2017/18 is mainly influenced by the allocation of the total provincial own revenue and additional funding made available through cash reserves to fund provincial priority projects in an endeavour to reduce the unemployment rate, alleviate poverty and reduce inequality in the province.
Honourable Speaker and Honourable Members The following are allocations by vote:
Vote 1: Office of the Premier
The Office of the Premier is allocated R395.7 million in 2017/18. The funding includes allocation for provincial priorities such as Information Technology system development and the finalisation of the Limpopo Integrated Infrastructure Master Plan (LIIMP).
Vote 2: Provincial Legislature
The Provincial Legislature is allocated a budget of R341.8 million in 2017/18 financial year. The allocation increases by 8.1 percent in 2017/18 and 6.3 percent over the MTEF period. The allocation makes provision for the implementation of the Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) system, normalisation of constituency allowances and provision for security system upgrades.
Vote 3: Education
The department is allocated R28.7 billion in 2017/18. The allocation increased by 5.9 percent in 2017/18 and 5.8 percent over the MTEF period. The allocation is funded from R26.2 billion equitable share, R2.1 billion conditional grants and R538.9 million from provincial own revenue.
Through this allocation, the department will implement policy priorities, which include funding of no- fee schools, teacher development, scholar transport, procurement of school furniture and school safety as well as the provision of the school nutrition programme. An amount of R30.0 million is allocated for ICT overhaul in the five Districts.
Vote 4: Agriculture
The total allocation for the department is R1.8 billion for 2017. This represents growth of 4.1 percent in 2017/18, 5.7 percent growth over the MTEF period. The 2017/18 allocation is funded by R1.5 billion equitable share and R323.7 million conditional grants. The department has reprioritised an amount of R50.0 million from compensation of employees to fund poverty alleviation projects within the agricultural sector.
Vote 5: Provincial Treasury
The Provincial Treasury receives a budget allocation of R474.6 million in 2017/18 financial year which represents 15.0 percent growth rate. The allocation decrease to R448.6 million in 2018/19 due to once-off allocation in 2017/18 and increases to R474.5 million in 2019/20 financial year. The once-off allocation is funding for the services of the Government Technical Advisory Centre (GTAC) which is providing support to provincial departments and Municipalities in infrastructure planning and implementation and a once-off allocation of R20.0 million to Musina Municipality.
Vote 6: Economic Development, Environment and Tourism
The department is allocated an amount of R1.5 billion in 2017/18. The budget increases by 12.6 percent in 2017/18 and 0.9 percent over the MTEF. The departmental allocation in 2017/18 financial year includes provision for provincial priorities such as the upgrading of nature reserves, upgrading of ICT infrastructure, Marula beneficiation project, promotion of SMME’s and Co-operatives, agri- business processing and broadband projects facilitated by Limpopo Economic Development Agency (LEDA), promotion of tourism and marketing of the Limpopo Province by Limpopo Tourism Agency (LTA) and compliance monitoring of casinos by Limpopo Gambling Board (LGB).
Included in the allocation to the Department is amounts to be transferred to the Department’s Public Entities. LEDA, the Tourism Agency and the Gambling Board are allocated R411.9 million, R103.1 million and R67.5 million respectively for 2017/18
Vote 7: Health
The allocation to the department is R18.0 billion in 2017/18. The budget increases by 10.2 percent in 2017/18 and 7.3 percent over the MTEF. The budget allocation for 2017/18 consists of R15.1 billion equitable share, R2.3 billion conditional grants and R471.8 million provincial own revenue. The allocation includes provision for the purchase of essential medical and allied equipment, upgrading of IT infrastructure and procurement of patient verification system to enhance revenue collection.
Vote 8: Transport
The total allocation for the department is R1.9 billion for 2017/18. The departmental allocation is growing below the CPI-X rate of 6.1 percent due to previous year allocation of once-off projects. Included in the allocation for 2017/18 financial year is the ‘transfer payments’ of R47.5 million to the Department’s Public Entity: Gateway Airport Authority Limited (GAAL).
Vote 9: Public Works, Roads and Infrastructure
The department is allocated an amount of R3.1 billion in 2017/18. The budget increases by 8.1 percent in 2017/18 and 3.9 percent over the MTEF. The 2017/18 allocation is funded by R2.0 billion equitable share and R1.1 billion conditional grants. Included in the allocation for 2017/18 financial year is a provision for infrastructure capacitation plan R30.0 million, procurement of new office space R60.0 million and R962.1 million to be transferred to the Department’s Public Entity, Roads Agency Limpopo (RAL), for upgrading and maintenance of the provincial roads infrastructure.
Vote 10: Safety, Security and Liaison
The allocation to the department is R103.7 million in 2017/18. The budget increases by 8.5 percent in 2017/18 and 6 percent over the MTEF. The allocation includes R2.0 million for EPWP Incentives Grant. This funding will enable the department to deliver on its mandate which includes the support to Community Safety Forums (CSF’s) and Community Policing Forums (CSF’s).
Vote 11: Co-operative Governance, Human Settlements and Traditional Affairs
The department is allocated an amount of R2.6 billion in 2017/18. The budget increases by 12.9 percent in 2017/18 and decreases by 6.9 percent over the MTEF. The 2017/18 allocation is funded by R1.3 billion equitable share and R1.3 billion conditional grant for housing and human settlements. The 2017/18 allocation includes an amount of R15.0 million for “Magoshi” to fund operational expenses and R70.0 million for construction of Traditional Council Offices.
Vote 12: Social Development
The department receives an allocation of R1.8 billion in 2017/18. The budget increases by 11.5 percent in 2017/18 and 7.6 percent over the MTEF. Included in the allocation, is an amount of R96.8 million for Early Childhood Development and Social Worker Employment grants as well as EPWP Social Sector Grant and a further R17.4 million for tools of trade for social welfare services.
Vote 13: Sport, Arts and Culture
The department is allocated R460.2 million in 2017/18, which represents an increase of 12.3 percent in 2017/18 and 6.1 percent over the MTEF period. The allocation is funded from R259.2 million equitable share and R191.0 million conditional grants. The 2017/18 financial year budget includes funding to host national and historic day celebrations, promotion and development of the creative industry including artists, procurement of electronic records management system, planning for the construction of a provincial theatre and construction of community libraries.
Honourable Speaker, as we conclude this financial year 16/17 we do so being more aware than ever of the challenges we face as the Limpopo Province administration.
We cannot loose sight of our responsibility and therefore we must ensure that each and every program that we have implemented and are about to implement meets its outcome as required. For this to happen all necessary oversight bodies must be vigilant and ensure these targets are indeed, met. Our Compensation of employees component still remains relatively high at around 70% of the total provincial budget, it would be appropriate if the outcomes of this spend realises that quality service is delivered to the people of the province.
Considering the enormous demands made on the fiscus we have no option but to drive the economy, because when the economy grows, revenue streams increase, which reduces the national governments need to raise funding by creating more debt. As the cost of debt to the fiscus is the fastest rising cost in our national budget we need to generate this economy of ours that will ensure that revenues generated will make our fiscus more sustainable, however when looking at the international norm of debt to GDP we as a country are at 49% debt to GDP and there are other countries that are closer to 90% debt to GDP yet the credit rating agencies don’t necessarily see this as a risk, where as we are seen as a risk, is this not a contradiction?
Unemployment, inequality and poverty remains our nemesis and we have to address these 3 challenges as best we can with the R60 billion plus budget we are about to implement in the 17/18 financial year.
I had the pleasure of addressing a chapter of ABSIP, essentially black youth transforming the financial sector, dynamic and positive group of young people. I would like to acknowledge Mr Maxwell Malinga of ABSIP and Ms Modjadji Head mistress from Makgongoana Secondary School, we have a very bright future, but we must become entrepreneurs again, we have done it before let us do it again.
In conclusion honourable Speaker, may I appreciate the support given by the Honourable Premier and his Executive Council. I have to mention the EXCOBUDCOM which comprises of the MEC's for Education, Health, Public Works, Road and Infrastructure and COGHSTA for their support and guidance when it comes to various budget decisions. The Portfolio Committee on Finance Chaired by the Honourable Soviet Lekgayane, thank you. The DG of the Province and other HODs, HOD Treasury Mr Gavin Pratt and his team, Team Finance. Much appreciated for the support and effort, it’s our job and we must do IT and do it well.
Let us in unity take our province and country forward. Honourable Speaker I hereby table the following budget documents:
The Limpopo Appropriation Bill, 2017;
Estimates of Provincial Revenue and Expenditure;
Overview of Provincial Revenue and Expenditure;
Socio-Economic Review and Overview; and
Supporting gazettes. Aluta Continua….
Thank you!
Table 1: Provincial Own Revenue per vote
R thousand |
2013/14 |
Outcome
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
Main Adjusted appropriation appropriation |
Revised estimate |
Medium-term estimates |
|
||
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
||||||
Vote 1:Office of the Premier |
1 369 |
1 069 |
1 834 |
755 |
1 239 |
1 239 |
777 |
821 |
867 |
Vote 2: Provincial Legislature |
176 |
189 |
316 |
207 |
331 |
331 |
219 |
234 |
246 |
Vote 3: Education |
40 179 |
38 192 |
63 781 |
43 395 |
63 673 |
63 673 |
41 614 |
43 748 |
46 065 |
Vote 4: Agriculture and Rural Development |
5 050 |
7 419 |
13 222 |
8 074 |
9 956 |
9 956 |
10 854 |
11 544 |
12 212 |
Vote 5: Provincial Treasury |
190 996 |
299 232 |
302 970 |
180 128 |
362 528 |
362 528 |
188 133 |
197 884 |
208 965 |
Vote 6: Economic Development, Enviromental Affairs and |
97 576 |
146 424 |
124 556 |
143 324 |
156 883 |
156 883 |
152 240 |
159 503 |
168 435 |
Vote 7: Health |
121 559 |
137 644 |
135 609 |
174 076 |
174 076 |
174 076 |
182 996 |
193 610 |
204 453 |
Vote 8: Transport |
350 007 |
397 788 |
419 630 |
449 064 |
465 198 |
465 198 |
494 040 |
523 189 |
552 487 |
Vote 9: Public Works, Roads and Infrastructure |
28 797 |
382 482 |
156 872 |
56 699 |
193 210 |
193 210 |
58 783 |
62 192 |
65 675 |
Vote 10: Safety, Security and Liaison |
363 |
254 |
254 |
104 |
160 |
160 |
115 |
122 |
128 |
Vote 11:Coorperative Governance, Human Settlements |
4 560 |
3 049 |
35 987 |
2 800 |
6 079 |
6 079 |
2 792 |
3 325 |
3 504 |
and Traditional Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote 12: Social Development |
3 831 |
6 889 |
3 424 |
3 273 |
18 948 |
18 948 |
3 438 |
3 637 |
3 841 |
Vote 13: Sport, Arts & Culture |
1 108 |
1 683 |
1 687 |
1 204 |
2 787 |
2 787 |
1 839 |
1 947 |
2 052 |
Total provincial own receipts |
845 570 |
1 422 314 |
1 260 142 |
1 063 103 |
1 455 068 |
1 455 068 |
1 137 839 |
1 201 756 |
1 268 931 |
Table 2: Summary of Provincial Receipts
Outcome
R thousand 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 |
Main Adjusted Revised appropriatio appropriatio estim ate |
Medium -term estim ates |
|
2016/17 |
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 |
||
Transfer receipts from national Equitable share 41 135 605 42 902 956 45 866 202 Conditional grants 5 112 898 6 696 347 7 202 991 |
48 708 568 48 708 568 48 708 568 7 120 045 7 791 829 7 791 829 |
51 960 337 55 385 631 59 370 905 7 884 978 8 379 051 8 913 034 |
|
Total transfer receipts from national 46 248 503 49 599 303 53 069 193 |
55 828 613 56 500 397 56 500 397 |
59 845 315 63 764 682 68 283 939 |
|
Provincial own receipts Tax receipts 318 911 358 874 409 938 |
427 193 453 877 453 877 |
475 120 502 277 530 404 |
|
Casino tax es Horse racing tax es Liqour licences Motor v ehicle licences |
42 645 48 467 56 600 8 773 14 089 18 001 3 197 3 133 3 300 264 296 293 185 332 037 |
66 472 66 472 66 472 13 031 18 728 18 728 4 012 4 012 4 012 343 678 364 665 364 665 |
69 796 73 286 77 390 13 813 14 395 15 201 4 236 4 473 4 723 387 275 410 123 433 090 |
Sale of goods and serv ices other than capital assets 220 224 240 349 241 103 Transfers receiv ed 2 000 - 149 Fines, penalties and forfeits 43 135 50 116 59 794 Interest, div idends and rent on land 196 456 298 353 318 739 Sale of capital assets 24 843 18 811 15 116 Transactions in financial assets and liabilities 40 002 455 811 215 303 |
336 432 287 837 287 837 - - - 55 549 68 288 68 288 182 327 363 157 363 157 15 166 30 531 30 531 46 435 251 378 251 378 |
357 246 377 815 398 880 - - - 71 571 75 792 80 037 190 616 200 411 211 632 10 367 11 264 11 872 32 920 34 198 36 106 |
|
Total provincial own receipts 845 570 1 422 314 1 260 142 |
1 063 103 1 455 068 1 455 068 1 137 839 1 201 756 1 268 931 |
||
Total provincial receipts 47 094 073 51 021 617 54 329 335 |
56 891 716 57 955 465 57 955 465 |
60 983 154 64 966 438 69 552 870 |
|
Table 3: Summary of Provincial Payments and Estimates by economic classification
R thousand |
2013/14 |
Outcome
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
Main Adjusted appropriation appropriation |
Revised estimate |
Medium-term estimate |
s |
||
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
||||||
Current payments |
39 808 280 |
42 531 678 |
44 776 576 |
48 536 118 |
49 407 545 |
49 830 740 |
51 909 171 |
55 072 771 |
58 626 938 |
Compensation of employees |
33 040 015 |
35 429 107 |
37 752 651 |
40 794 081 |
40 789 187 |
40 724 928 |
43 055 737 |
45 559 055 |
48 172 688 |
Goods and services |
6 767 983 |
7 102 131 |
7 023 440 |
7 741 600 |
8 617 921 |
9 105 376 |
8 852 563 |
9 512 797 |
10 453 280 |
Interest and rent on land |
282 |
440 |
485 |
437 |
437 |
437 |
870 |
920 |
970 |
Transfers and subsidies to: |
4 312 281 |
5 626 757 |
6 061 628 |
6 089 850 |
7 292 338 |
7 415 003 |
7 452 058 |
7 604 771 |
7 954 389 |
Provinces and municipalities |
47 146 |
113 223 |
96 537 |
83 387 |
145 532 |
137 998 |
109 153 |
87 616 |
76 623 |
Departmental agencies and accounts |
1 093 136 |
1 711 578 |
1 405 801 |
1 281 400 |
1 638 213 |
1 650 213 |
1 675 302 |
1 550 712 |
1 590 932 |
Universities and technikons |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Public corporations and private enterprises |
599 236 |
652 956 |
651 890 |
680 875 |
691 979 |
691 875 |
711 054 |
741 786 |
783 326 |
Foreign governments and international organisations |
- |
67 581 |
79 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Non-profit institutions |
1 631 875 |
1 811 849 |
2 089 925 |
2 254 274 |
2 605 266 |
2 606 873 |
2 920 385 |
3 040 428 |
3 176 815 |
Households |
940 888 |
1 269 570 |
1 817 396 |
1 789 915 |
2 211 347 |
2 328 043 |
2 036 165 |
2 184 230 |
2 326 693 |
Payments for capital assets |
1 726 367 |
2 185 906 |
2 097 639 |
2 343 067 |
2 349 317 |
2 340 561 |
2 097 497 |
1 632 762 |
1 498 479 |
Buildings and other fixed structures |
1 474 381 |
1 911 602 |
1 635 534 |
1 778 779 |
1 673 855 |
1 667 121 |
1 327 006 |
1 137 730 |
1 053 655 |
Machinery and equipment |
251 699 |
273 506 |
461 755 |
550 888 |
661 974 |
659 951 |
768 441 |
492 864 |
442 612 |
Heritage assets |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
Specialised military assets |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Biological assets |
- |
- |
- |
2 051 |
2 051 |
2 051 |
2 050 |
2 167 |
2 211 |
Land and subsoil assets |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Software and other intangible assets |
287 |
798 |
350 |
11 350 |
11 438 |
11 438 |
- |
1 |
1 |
Payments for financial assets |
10 030 |
59 785 |
36 148 |
400 |
832 |
10 196 |
- |
- |
- |
Total economic classification |
45 856 958 |
50 404 126 |
52 971 991 |
56 969 436 |
59 050 032 |
59 596 501 |
61 458 726 |
64 310 305 |
68 079 806 |
Less: Unauthorised expenditure Baseline Available for Spending |
4 498 |
- |
- |
49 376 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
45 852 460 |
50 404 126 |
52 971 991 |
56 920 060 |
59 050 032 |
59 596 501 |
61 458 726 |
64 310 305 |
68 079 806 |
Table 4: Summary of Provincial Payments and Estimates per vote
R thousand 2013/14 |
Outcome
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
Main Adjusted appropriation appropriation |
Revised estimate |
Medium-term estimate |
s |
|||
2016/17 |
2017/18 |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
||||||
Vote 01: Office of the Premier |
325 295 |
340 862 |
340 674 |
376 286 |
379 766 |
379 766 |
395 789 |
414 480 |
438 520 |
Vote 02: Provincial Legislature |
249 271 |
273 323 |
297 960 |
316 243 |
351 818 |
351 818 |
341 810 |
358 926 |
379 744 |
Vote 03: Education |
22 647 979 |
24 419 274 |
25 118 175 |
27 171 746 |
27 591 674 |
27 555 093 |
28 783 149 |
30 440 345 |
32 194 772 |
Vote 04: Agriculture and Rural Development |
1 530 375 |
1 555 401 |
1 620 254 |
1 782 912 |
1 793 216 |
1 793 216 |
1 855 352 |
1 962 624 |
2 105 664 |
Vote 05: Provincial Treasury |
358 534 |
346 305 |
363 722 |
412 604 |
455 241 |
452 484 |
474 620 |
448 614 |
474 633 |
Vote 06: Economic Development, Environmental Affairs an |
1 071 242 |
1 112 393 |
1 153 443 |
1 332 930 |
1 350 120 |
1 341 264 |
1 500 308 |
1 293 360 |
1 368 375 |
Vote 07: Health |
13 137 862 |
14 526 110 |
15 432 089 |
16 371 023 |
17 098 722 |
17 693 377 |
18 042 777 |
18 990 763 |
20 235 709 |
Vote 08: Transport |
2 845 213 |
1 704 488 |
1 727 714 |
1 879 151 |
1 899 651 |
1 899 651 |
1 962 385 |
2 073 926 |
2 193 490 |
Vote 09: Public Works, Roads and Infrastructure |
858 941 |
2 787 867 |
2 685 343 |
2 901 370 |
3 101 835 |
3 101 835 |
3 135 729 |
3 195 712 |
3 258 251 |
Vote 10: Safety, Securiy and Liaison |
62 658 |
72 660 |
82 656 |
95 617 |
95 817 |
95 823 |
103 713 |
107 714 |
113 961 |
Vote 11: Coorperative Governance, Human Settlements and Traditional Affairs |
1 186 638 |
1 525 470 |
2 185 684 |
2 286 043 |
2 813 814 |
2 813 814 |
2 581 771 |
2 645 307 |
2 794 961 |
Vote 12: Social Development |
1 324 137 |
1 455 600 |
1 585 497 |
1 633 719 |
1 679 839 |
1 679 839 |
1 821 036 |
1 920 534 |
2 032 940 |
Vote 13: Sport, Arts & Culture |
258 813 |
284 373 |
378 780 |
409 791 |
438 520 |
438 520 |
460 288 |
457 999 |
488 788 |
Total provincial payments by vote |
45 856 958 |
50 404 126 |
52 971 991 |
56 969 436 |
59 050 032 |
59 596 500 |
61 458 726 |
64 310 304 |
68 079 807 |
Less: Unauthorised expenditure Baseline available for spending |
4 498 |
- |
- |
49 376 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
45 852 460 |
50 404 126 |
52 971 991 |
56 920 060 |
59 050 032 |
59 596 500 |
61 458 726 |
64 310 304 |
68 079 807 |
R thousand Vote 3 National School Nutrition Programme Dinaledi Schools Grant HIV/AIDS (Life Skills Educvation) Technical Secondary Schools Recapitalisation Eduaction Infrastructure Grant of which Eduaction Infrastructure Grant (flood) EPWP Incentive Allocation Social Sector (EPWP) Grant Maths, Science and Technology Grant Vote 4 |
2013/14 |
Outcome
2014/15 |
2015/16 |
Main appropriation |
Adjusted appropriation |
Revised estimate |
Medium-term estimates |
||
2016/17 |
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 |
||||||||
2 079 542 |
2 331 102 |
1 919 683 |
1 997 326 |
2 200 304 |
2 200 304 |
2 064 788 |
2 182 221 |
2 302 204 |
|
872 786 |
985 580 |
990 903 |
1 085 431 |
1 111 311 |
1 111 311 |
1 161 389 |
1 229 299 |
1 290 763 |
|
8 498 |
2 678 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9 853 |
24 565 |
29 243 |
|
13 704 |
9 610 |
24 239 |
33 310 |
33 310 |
33 310 |
35 339 |
37 388 |
39 482 |
|
3 395 |
18 060 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
1 147 022 |
1 296 217 |
863 797 |
830 532 |
1 007 630 |
1 007 630 |
810 523 |
845 828 |
895 026 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
20 277 |
69 366 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
2 671 |
2 000 |
2 000 |
2 000 |
2 000 |
- |
- |
|
34 137 |
18 957 |
2 483 |
3 500 |
3 500 |
3 500 |
2 888 |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
35 590 |
42 553 |
42 553 |
42 553 |
42 796 |
45 141 |
47 690 |
|
325 059 |
296 360 |
329 330 |
339 366 |
339 670 |
339 670 |
323 750 |
340 657 |
389 623 |
|
Disaster Management (Drought relief) Land Care Comprehensive Agriculture Support Programme of which Comprehensive Agriculture Support Programme EPWP Incentive Allocation EPWP Integrated-rural. ILima/Letsema Projects |
- 16 153 247 169
- 19 384 - 42 353 |
- 9 988 223 150 - 25 224 14 898 2 263 46 061 |
- 9 903 263 805
22 837 5 285 - 50 337 |
- 10 438 260 576
15 555 4 476 - 63 876 |
- 10 438 260 880
15 555 4 476 - 63 876 |
- 10 438 260 880
4 476 - 63 876 |
- 13 672 238 991
5 000 3 731 - 67 356 |
- 12 873 256 521
- - - 71 263 |
- 13 700 300 669
- - - 75 254 |
Vote 06 |
550 |
2 075 |
2 482 |
3 443 |
3 443 |
3 443 |
2 567 |
- |
- |
EPWP Incentive Allocation |
550 |
2 075 |
2 482 |
3 443 |
3 443 |
3 443 |
2 567 |
- |
- |
Vote 7 |
1 501 208 |
1 920 244 |
1 879 185 |
2 053 864 |
2 086 849 |
2 086 849 |
2 390 605 |
2 545 486 |
2 840 570 |
Health Professions Training and Development Health Facility Revitalisation of which Health Infrastructure Health Revitalisation (flood damage) Nursing Colleges and Schools component Comprehensive HIV and AIDS National Tertiary Services Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Grant EPWP Incentive Allocation Social Sector (EPWP) Grant National Health Insurance |
97 027 233 140
104 081 - 6 925 836 232 310 480 - 1 823 13 649 8 857 |
132 185 507 061 - - - - 937 097 331 647 - 2 512 2 577 7 165 |
117 554 357 322
- 6 921 - 1 065 528 312 393 - 1 079 17 826 7 483 |
123 960 379 089
- - - 1 176 489 344 723 - - 22 060 7 543 |
124 787 379 089
- - - 1 190 823 362 361 - - 22 060 7 729 |
124 787 379 089
- - - 1 190 823 362 361 - - 22 060 7 729 |
131 726 508 144
- - - 1 354 308 366 314 - - 30 113 - |
139 366 450 991
- - - 1 540 098 387 560 27 471 - - - |
147 168 476 247
- - - 1 778 883 409 263 29 009 - - - |
Vote 8 |
795 121 |
294 161 |
298 298 |
326 129 |
326 129 |
326 129 |
345 610 |
361 761 |
382 020 |
Provincial Roads Maintenance Grant |
505 849 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
EPWP Incentive Allocation |
14 340 |
4 518 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Public Transport Operations |
274 932 |
289 643 |
298 298 |
326 129 |
326 129 |
326 129 |
345 610 |
361 761 |
382 020 |
Vote 9 |
3 000 |
1 176 113 |
976 853 |
999 935 |
1 024 964 |
1 024 964 |
1 146 284 |
1 239 036 |
1 188 088 |
Provincial Roads Maintenance Grant of which Transport Disaster Management EPWP Incentive Allocation |
-
- 3 000 |
1 173 861 - 79 613 2 252 |
969 733
90 895 7 120 |
995 109
100 000 4 826 |
1 020 138
100 000 4 826 |
1 020 138
100 000 4 826 |
1 140 387
130 000 5 897 |
1 239 036
130 000 - |
1 188 088
140 000 - |
Vote 10 |
- |
- |
2 078 |
- |
- |
- |
2 000 |
- |
- |
EPWP Incentive Allocation |
- |
- |
2 078 |
- |
- |
- |
2 000 |
- |
- |
Vote 11 |
294 961 |
517 591 |
1 592 718 |
1 210 370 |
1 605 212 |
1 605 212 |
1 321 493 |
1 400 688 |
1 478 154 |
Human Settlement Development of which Human Settlement Development (flood repair) Earmarked additions for the ff mining towns Thabazimbi Greater Tubatse Elias Motsoaledi Lephalale Fetakgomo( LIM 476) Housing Disaster Management EPWP Incentive Allocation |
294 961
- - - - - - - - - |
517 031 - 5 701 17 540 7 171 1 684 3 255 4 720 710 560 - |
1 591 889
34 182 154 176 16 357 36 520 16 600 77 063 7 636 - 829 |
1 208 370
29 678 66 330 27 100 6 430 12 300 17 800 2 700 - 2 000 |
1 603 212
29 678 66 330 27 100 6 430 12 300 17 800 2 700 - 2 000 |
1 603 212
29 678 66 330 27 100 6 430 12 300 17 800 2 700 - 2 000 |
1 319 493
- 81 389 22 255 32 180 10 103 14 648 2 203 - 2 000 |
1 400 688
- 72 344 19 782 28 604 8 980 13 020 1 958 - - |
1 478 154
- 63 303 17 309 25 029 7 858 11 393 1 714 - - |
Vote 12 |
8 915 |
2 772 |
3 109 |
11 242 |
11 242 |
11 242 |
96 847 |
113 045 |
120 616 |
Social Sector (EPWP) Grant |
8 915 |
2 772 |
3 109 |
11 242 |
11 242 |
11 242 |
8 978 |
- |
- |
Early Childhood Devveloment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
41 085 |
62 414 |
65 901 |
Social work employment grant |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
46 784 |
50 631 |
54 715 |
Vote 13 |
104 542 |
155 929 |
199 255 |
178 370 |
194 016 |
194 016 |
191 034 |
196 157 |
211 759 |
Mass Participation and Sport Develoment Grant |
59 618 |
58 848 |
63 417 |
61 075 |
67 033 |
67 033 |
67 850 |
68 352 |
77 056 |
Community Library Services |
44 441 |
95 024 |
133 897 |
115 295 |
124 983 |
124 983 |
121 184 |
127 805 |
134 703 |
EPWP Incentive Allocation |
483 |
2 057 |
1941 |
2 000 |
2 000 |
2 000 |
2 000 |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|||||||
Total conditional grants |
5 112 898 |
6 696 347 |
7 202 991 |
7 120 045 |
7 791 829 |
7 791 829 |
7 884 978 |
8 379 051 |
8 913 034 |