N Pandor: Education Dept Budget Vote 2007/08

Speech by Mrs Naledi Pandor, MP, Minister of Education, tabling
departmental Budget Vote for 2007/08 financial year

29 May 2007

"Affirming excellence and challenging mediocrity"

I learned with great sadness yesterday of another death of a leaner in one
of our schools. I wish to convey my sympathies to the family and to assure them
that we will intensify our efforts at addressing violence in our schools. I
repeat again my appeal to all parents and community members to support us in
creating safe and caring schools. We must do more to teach young people values
of respect for each other and non-violence as well as the lessons of conflict
resolution.

I am also concerned at the possibility of an educator strike in the next few
days. I know that all role players are keen to resolve the current impasse.
Government is keen to improve the remuneration of teachers, the R8,1 billion
allocated to improving conditions in the sector attests to this commitment. I
hope that the excellent record of continuous education of the fast few years
will not be broken.

It is also worrying that as we meet here there are thousands of children in
Khutsong who are being denied education by their own community. It is tragic
indeed that the learners of Khutsong are being made sacrificial lambs and are
being denied their right to education. History will judge us all harshly for
what has been permitted by matured community members and those who have
attempted to pretend that boycotting learning will not harm the future of those
young people.

Once more I urge parents to assume responsibility for the future of their
children, to insist on teaching and learning and to support our young people to
realise their fullest potential. If the boycott continues unabated, clearly the
MEC must look at options that will provide schooling for the learners. They
must not be victims.

Chairperson, in the 2006 education budget the following priorities were
identified for action: no fee schools, Quality Improvement and Development
Strategy (Qids-up), the implementation of the new curriculum in grades 10 to
12, the expansion of Education Management Information System (EMIS), the
improvement of human resource systems and capacity development, the
strengthening of special schools, Further Education and Training (FET) college
recapitalisation, the expansion of grade R and implementation of the Early
Childhood Development (ECD) integrated plan.

Today I report on these priorities and set out the objectives we intend to
pursue in 2007.

While I do acknowledge progress in this report it is important to repeat
once more, we are not yet where we want to be. In the 2006 debate, I asked
whether the education sector and our communities are ready to excel? I return
to the theme of excelling this year as it is vital that we redouble our efforts
at doing far better than we are doing today.

This year I call on all of us to affirm excellence and challenge mediocrity
in the interest of advancing the objective of quality education for all.

I make this call to assert excellence because it is clear that all of us
have to give far greater attention to achieving positive outcomes through our
work. Such a focus by all of us will ensure that we give effect to our
obligation to offer real learning and achievement opportunities to all our
learners and students. Furthermore, given that there are schools, principals,
teachers, learners, colleges and universities that work well we should
acknowledge, replicate and reward positive performance.

I urge South Africans to affirm excellence and reject mediocrity in the
interest of nation building, socio-economic development and true liberation.
The levels of under-performance in our education system are unacceptably high
and an unjust subversion of the historic promise of freedom and democracy that
we've put before our people.

At the system level in research and in protest we have spent a great deal of
time focusing on the negative, we have appeared far too tolerant of mediocrity
in its many guises and extremely neglectful of that which works and of those
who are doing what must be done.

We seem to tolerate and assert the rights of children who are abusive,
violent and disruptive. Very little is said about young achievers, emerging
scientists, successful schools and academic institutions with positive
intellectual outcomes. We have become a moaning nation rather than one that
celebrates and expands success.

We tolerate parents who don't care to support their children, who don't care
to support our schools, who fail in their duty as parents.

We tolerate public officials who are not up to the task of administrative or
professional support, who leave work early, who fail to pay subsidies to
schools on time and who do not yet reflect the objectives and principles of
Batho Pele.

We also tolerate mediocrity in the teaching force. We tolerate too much that
is unprofessional. We tolerate late coming, little and sometimes no teaching,
constant under-performance and poor academic success.

I know some people will be angry when I say this. It'll be the one thing
lifted from my speech, out of the many things that will be said. Nevertheless
it must be said.

The defence of mediocrity is supported by unjustifiable arguments. Some cite
apartheid. I acknowledge that the legacy of apartheid continues to affect us,
but it no longer serves to explain continued failures on our part. Others cite
inadequate resources. Yet this is also no longer a persuasive argument.

Our people ask, 'how long do we have to wait?' I want to say today, we
intend to intensify our efforts at ensuring that our people wait no longer!

Chairperson, there are positive achievements in the various phases of
education that we should and can celebrate:
* the 96 schools that achieved passes of 50 or more in maths higher grade
(HG)
* the 13 schools that achieved over 100 passes in maths HG (not enough I admit
but achievers nevertheless)
* the nine Readathon schools that were recognised among many entrants for
reading excellence in 2006
* the teacher nominees in the National Teacher Awards
* rural schools that achieve 100% success
* Higher education institutions (HEIs) that achieve top ranking research
outcomes and international awards
* learners and students who are high achievers and outstanding leaders
* the successful hosting of the Commonwealth Conference of Education Ministers
in December 2006
* the energy and enthusiasm that is evident in the newly recapitalised FET
college sector.

This year we will promote and affirm this excellence. We will also actively
challenge and reject mediocrity.

We will affirm excellence through performance reward for teachers, for
schools, universities and colleges.

We will also act more decisively against under-performance and provide
necessary support where disadvantage or inequity exists.

All the departments of education will have to substantially improve their
performance. Faster action on agreed priorities and effective support and
monitoring of the system will be strengthened.

Chairperson, while we remain seriously concerned at our failings we are able
to report progress in regard to the priorities set out for 2006/07.

In 2006, our call to expand access to schooling received concerted
attention. We addressed the exclusion of the poorest from our schools.

In 2006 over two million learners (20%) benefited from the pilot
introduction of our no-fee schools policy.

In 2007 over five million learners (40%) will benefit from improved funding
and freedom from the threat of exclusion.

There have been worrying inadequacies in the introduction of our complex
quintile based policy, but the general reports across the system indicate that
parents and many teachers regard the policy as a welcome development.

In the 2007 financial year, we will continue to monitor and refine
implementation to ensure that schools and learners benefit from the no fee
policy. It is clear that there are still administrative gaps to be ironed out.
Some schools have also complained that they face a decline in annual income. It
was never the intention to reduce income. Rather beneficiary schools should
receive increased funding.

The planning branch is working with provincial departments to address the
reported failures in our execution of the policy.

All honest commentators confirm that this policy is an important step toward
achieving our government's goals of equity in access and quality.

While the policy is a welcome development, the time may have arrived for
South Africa to offer all children free primary education in law. This would
place us in step with modern democracies worldwide.

That subject is an aspect Parliament could reflect on in detail.

A new challenge has emerged in the process of implementing the policy.
Several schools that are in close proximity to no fee schools do not benefit
from the policy. Furthermore, there are fee-charging schools that admit
hundreds of poor learners, exempt them in terms of our policy and receive no
compensatory support from the departments. We have to devise strategies and
policy for assisting such schools. These are not wealthy schools, they serve
poor communities and are deserving of consideration.

In 2006, we introduced the Quids-Up for the upliftment of schools. The
programme was not given the attention we had anticipated in provincial budgets
last year. As honourable colleagues are aware provinces determine their own
allocations and while we may agree priority areas they are not always funded.
However, this year the improvement strategy will be supported and acted upon in
all provinces. The targeted poorest schools will receive additional resources
and development support. Just over R2 billion has been allocated to this
programme over the 2007 Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF).

The House will recall that last year we reported on our plans in regard to
the FET college sector. Very positive progress has been made. The new
programmes in key skills and economic sectors have been introduced, the college
recapitalisation plans have been developed, approved and funded for all 50
colleges. Colleges have new modern information and communication technology
(ICT) facilities and many are finalising their new governance structures. We
have also published policy on the new National Certificate (NC) Vocational.

We announced last year that in order to respond to the priorities agreed in
the Joint Initiative for Priority Skills Acquisition (JIPSA) processes we
should aim to admit 25 000 students to the new 11 programmes developed in
partnership with industry and key practitioners. We are pleased to report that
we have exceeded our target of 25 000 new admissions.

I am also pleased to report a significant agreement with the construction
sector. Two centres of excellence in this field will be set up at Tshwane North
and North link colleges, 100 funded students will be enrolled this year growing
to a 1 000 students in construction skills training in the next five years. The
industry will also provide workplace experience for all the students.

Another priority was the expansion of the EMIS through the development of
the learners unit record information system and the improvement of human
resource systems. This project continues to be a focus for this financial
year.

Significant progress has been made in the roll out of the South African
Schools Administration (SA-SAMS). This school administration system is
maintained by the Department and all provinces have adopted it.

The Department undertook its first ever independent audit of the provision
of data by public schools annually in its snap and annual survey. The pilot
indicates that some schools are inflating data in respect of registered
learners, while some schools do not keep any records whatsoever. Stringent
measures will be taken to ensure the provision of reliable information. And we
will act against dishonest school managers.

In 2006, provincial ECD budgets increased by more than 40% and in 2007 there
is a further increase of more than 40%. This increase is off a low base but the
sector and grade R in particular is a priority now and in the immediate
future.

Our performance in the ECD domain is one of our poor performance areas. We
need to speed up implementation of the integrated plan and consider a sharper
review of the current allocation of responsibility for this important part of
education. We will strengthen our collaboration with health and social
development in an effort to give effect to wider access to quality ECD
opportunities.

Chairperson, the Department's direct budget is R16 billion this year. Of
this R16 billion, universities receive R13,3 billion. This is an increase of
R1,5 billion (13%) over 2006. It is a substantial budget increase.

The R13,3 billion is composed of three main items: block grants, student
loans, and merger funds. The largest item is R11,3 billion for block grants.
This R11,3 billion is an increase of R1,08 billion (10,6%) over 2006. The
second largest item is R1,3 billion for student loans. This R1,3 billion is an
increase of R404,7 million (44,5%) over 2006. Of this R404,7 increase, R120
million will be used for teacher bursaries, and R100 million for FET college
bursaries. The last item is R600 million for university mergers. By the end of
next year R3,1 billion will have been allocated to mergers since commencing
with the restructuring process in 2001.

Chairperson, this budget allocates significant new funds into higher
education (HE) more than R2 billion over the 2007 MTEF, the funds will support
infrastructure improvement on many campuses, improve academic salaries and
focus attention on academic support.

But this is not all. We have made more funds available for institutional
infrastructure improvement from old funds. Earmarked funds have already been
allocated to individual universities for particular initiatives, following
extensive joint discussions on student enrolment planning and outputs.

These initiatives include refurbishing existing and building new academic
and support buildings, student residences, improving teaching and learning
equipment and library facilities particularly at newly merged historically
disadvantaged institutions.

In fact over the four years 2006 to 2009 the total funds provided for
infrastructure improvement amount to over R4 billion.

Chairperson, I am sure that members will agree that this represents a
welcome and absolutely necessary injection of resources into the public HE
system. We have made it clear that the earmarked funds must be used in focused
and accountable ways, so that they contribute to improved student outcomes and
support us in achieving our national human resource development priorities.

The student enrolment planning process that we referred to last year has
been finalised. We have an agreed plan for the growth of HE. We believe the
plan to grow from 738 000 students in 2005 to 820 000 by 2010 creates the basis
for a more efficient and coherent system of HE.

Growth in all disciplines has been accepted as part of the plan. However,
the greatest expansion will be in the fields of SET. These are key disciplines
for knowledge creation, innovation and human resource development and we will
invest in them to ensure that we succeed in expanding success in these
disciplines.

A key focus over the next few years will be on well-designed academic
development programmes and the provision of student support services on all
campuses with a view to enhancing academic success.

The merger processes are reaching finality in most of the institutions. I
have now approved all but three of the institutional operating plans of the new
universities and the remainder should be concluded within this financial
year.

Several of the merged institutions have taken deliberate steps to create new
institutions with a single shared identity. For some, however, unity of purpose
and full shared collaboration continue to seem elusive. We continue to engage
with universities to support the process of developing stronger more able
academic institutions in South Africa.

Our universities must be congratulated for the role they are playing in
expanding graduate success and human resource development in Southern African
Development Community (SADC) and the whole of Africa. We have over 55 000
students in our universities from the rest of Africa.

One of the elusive objectives has proven to be the development of niche
excellence and differentiation in our system. New institutions have found
themselves under pressure to continue offering old, unattractive programmes
that are not supported by skilled and competent academic practitioners.

The support given to the government JIPSA process by vice chancellors and
deans of schools of engineering has supported the Department in developing a
plan to expand access and success in engineering. Last year over R48 million
was allocated to faculties of engineering across the country. We plan to
develop a similar partnership with universities of technology.

One of the challenges we still face is that of modernising and refreshing
programme structure and content (the curriculum) of all programmes in the
university sector. The seeming reluctance to address curriculum reform is a
puzzle.

Student financial aid and widening access to poor talented students is also
an area that we are attending to. All loan repayees are congratulated for their
service to South Africa and its youth. Their contribution to creating new
opportunities for young people, their integrity as exhibited by their
repayment, all serve to confirm that we have young graduates in South Africa
who fully understand each individual's responsibility for giving life to a
truly developmental State.

It has to be said that not all practice in the sector is positive. The fee
levels at many institutions continue to be prohibitive. I trust that the
improvement in state funding will lead to a sectoral review of fee levels.

It has been distressing to note and act on serious if not criminal
governance and fiduciary lapses at some of our institutions.

Some of our institution leaders have treated public finances as their
personal accounts. Others have failed to give institutional leadership. In some
institutions academics appear to have little pride in original intellectual
work, plagiarism and unscholarly academic practices do not enhance the profile
of the sector and Higher Education South Africa (HESA) must act speedily to
address these lapses and avoid state intrusion in academic affairs.

The financial lapses have convinced me that stronger objective oversight
mechanisms must be established to protect public finances and the reputations
of honest hard working vice chancellors and academics. The work that is being
done by the Council for HE on regulation and autonomy in HE will assist us in
determining further action.

I have an exciting new project to announce today, a project that will assist
us to widen access to further and HE.

More and more people in our country aspire to enter post secondary
education. We need to create diverse and flexible mechanisms to support this
demand. A significant barrier to access has been financial need. The National
Students Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) has provided welcome relief, but more is
needed to address gaps in funding.

It's not just a social need to give more people from more diverse
backgrounds access to HE. It's an economic necessity.

We have identified an intervention that we believe will serve this expanded
need. I am pleased to announce this exciting response. It is a scheme that will
allow South Africans an opportunity to plan and save for the post secondary
education of their children.

It will be called the Fundisa Fund. It is a public-private partnership (PPP)
between the Department and the Association of Collective Investments. The
scheme is a long-term collective investment in which the State will match the
regular monthly saving a parent/s invests for their child's education at
university or FET college. The intention is to encourage education saving and
provide state support to assist families that can put aside small amounts for
future education purposes. The fund encourages long term saving for education
and it encourages access to further or university education.

I'm pleased to be able to announce today's launch of a three-year pilot of
the Fundisa Fund, classified as a domestic fixed interest income category fund,
managed by the Association of Collective Investments in partnership with
NSFAS.

When I met with the representatives of the Association of Collective
Investments, I agreed to the partnership on condition that they secure seed
contributions to Fundisa from the private sector. I'm pleased to inform you
that this has indeed happened and a number of pledges have been made.

The members of the Association of Collective Investments will also cover all
the administrative and advocacy costs of the pilot.

From the side of government, I'm happy to report that the NSFAS board has
agreed to set aside a sum of R20 million towards the matching grant component
of Fundisa.

If the pilot scheme is a success we'll be able to expand Fundisa's reach. We
will not see the impact of Fundisa for many years but when children begin to
redeem their Fundisa funds we'll be able to see how far sighted we've been. In
future, I hope that qualifying families will be able to draw on a combination
of their Fundisa savings and NSFAS funding to support their children's HE. It
is a future that will bring new hope to many of our people.

I return now to the theme of affirming excellence. In 2007, we intend to
focus on expanding success and enhancing quality in education practice, policy
and our own administration.

Several initiatives have been introduced in this financial year as our
concrete action on various priorities.

The 2007 budget provides R700 million for teacher bursaries over the next
three years, the first R120 million of which has been fully committed for 3 000
student teachers in the Fundza Lushaka Bursary Programme.

The Fundza Lushaka programme gives preference to students who come from
rural areas and to students who want to train in priority subject and learning
areas where teachers are in short supply such as mathematics, science,
technology (including ICT) and indigenous languages, English and teaching in
the foundation phase.

The Framework for Teacher Development has been declared policy. It is
designed to meet the need of developing a committed competent core of education
professionals for a democratic South Africa. It provides an overall strategy
for the recruitment, retention and professional development of teachers.

Excellence has been noted in thousands of our teachers. I recognise here
today the winners of the 2005 and 2006 Lifetime Achievement Awards, Mrs Mantwa
Aphane and Mrs Matshediso Mashishi respectively. They represent those teachers
who are deserving of performance reward and recognition for professional
conduct.

The introduction of R600 million for bursaries (R100 million this year) in
the FET college sector is a further positive development in education.

The most encouraging development in this year is the mass literacy campaign
that will be implemented from 2008.

The Ministerial Committee has tabled its report, a Secretariat is working
hard on the planning for implementation in 2008. We acknowledge with great
thanks the support and assistance that we have received from our comrades in
Cuba in this process.

This campaign is set to infuse new energy focus and purpose into Adult Basic
Education and Training (ABET).

To this end our budget is boosted by a further R850 million for a step up in
our ABET programmes (R20 million of which is available this year for planning
purposes).

We will not neglect our promise to address the basic foundation skills for
learning, reading, writing and numeracy.

Our literacy development and reading improvement strategy continues to be a
firm focus. This year we introduce Early Grade Reading Assessment to assist
teachers in supporting learning. You will have seen the bags branded with "Drop
all and Read". They are part of our campaign to encourage children to read. I
acknowledge the great support in this field of the READ organisation, as well
as interventions such as the rally to read project.

In 2008 we will have our third national systemic evaluation, provinces must
intensify support to teachers for teaching reading skills. The curriculum myth
that ignored reading must be challenged and overturned. Our schools and
teachers must perform better in the evaluation of 2008.

These, Chairperson, are some of the key priorities we intend to act on to
ensure that we affirm, promote and inculcate excellence and root out
mediocrity.

In closing, I wish to stress that we will continue to work with colleagues
in other ministries and departments to extend success in collaboration that was
achieved in 2006. Colleagues in treasury, public works, water affairs and
forestry, minerals and energy and of course labour and science and technology
have all contributed to our programmes and objectives. I convey my thanks to
them.

Thanks too to the hardworking Director-General, Duncan Hindle, the deputy
directors-general (DDGs) and all officials in the Department. Thanks too to
Deputy Minister Surty, the staff in the Ministry, the chair of the portfolio
committee and honourable members and last but not least my husband and our
children for their tolerance and patience. I commend the vote to the House in
the hope that honourable members will support it.

Issued by: Department of Education
29 May 2007

Share this page

Similar categories to explore